Category: Christianity

  • From Prophetic Thunder to Therapeutic Whispers: The Tragic Decline of Biblical Preaching

    The stark contrast between 19th-century preaching and contemporary pulpit ministry reveals a troubling trajectory in modern Christianity. Where once the Word of God was proclaimed with uncompromising clarity and theological precision, today’s sermons often reflect a diluted gospel that accommodates cultural sensibilities rather than confronting them.

    The Uncompromising Nature of Historical Preaching

    Nineteenth-century preachers possessed an unwavering commitment to biblical exposition that modern congregations would find shocking. They did not hesitate to use stark language when addressing spiritual realities – terms like “utterly miserable,” “despicable sinners,” and “wickedly evil before God’s sight” were commonplace. These men understood that sin is sin, regardless of cultural context or personal feelings.

    The preaching of that era followed systematic, verse-by-verse exposition with clear three-point structures that mirrored biblical narratives. Each sermon concluded with practical application sections that fearlessly addressed contemporary issues – whether Western individualismreligious formalism, or cultural accommodation within the church. The theological foundation was unshakeable: God’s absolute sovereignty, human inability to save themselves, and Christ as the only mediator.

    Consider how Charles Spurgeon would declare: “You are condemned sinners deserving of hell,” while today’s preachers speak of people being merely “broken” and needing “healing.” The difference is not merely stylistic – it reflects a fundamental shift in understanding human nature and God’s holiness.

    The Educational Revolution and Its Consequences

    Modern education has produced a generation that questions absolute truth and embraces relativistic thinking. Where 19th-century congregations accepted the authority of Scripture without hesitation, today’s audiences demand explanations that satisfy their intellectual pride. This shift has forced many preachers to adopt a more “scholarly” approach that often obscures rather than illuminates biblical truth.

    The explosion of information through social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube has created congregations that are simultaneously more informed yet less discerning. People know more about psychology, sociology, and cultural trends than previous generations, but they lack the spiritual wisdom to distinguish between human wisdom and divine revelation. This has led to sermons that sound more like TED talks than prophetic proclamations.

    Contemporary examples abound: Joel Osteen’s “Your Best Life Now” philosophy transforms the gospel into self-help therapy, while prosperity preachers on television promise health and wealth rather than holiness and heaven. The uncomfortable truths about God’s wrath have been replaced with messages about “living your purpose” and “finding your destiny.”

    The Dilution of Gospel Truth

    Perhaps most devastating is the systematic dilution of the gospel itself. Where 19th-century preachers proclaimed man’s total depravity and desperate need for salvation, modern sermons often focus on self-improvement and personal fulfillment. Scripture declares that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23), yet contemporary preaching frequently suggests that people are merely victims of circumstances rather than rebels against their Creator.

    The therapeutic language of modern psychology has infiltrated the pulpit. Terms like “dysfunction,” “codependency,” and “emotional healing” have replaced biblical categories of sin, repentance, and regeneration. Marriage conferences focus on “communication skills” and “love languages” rather than the biblical roles outlined in Ephesians 5:22-33. Parenting seminars emphasize building children’s “self-esteem” rather than training them “in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4).

    Consider how Rick Warren’s “Purpose Driven Life” approach, while containing some truth, fundamentally shifts the focus from God’s glory to human fulfillment. The question is no longer “How can I glorify God?” but “How can I find my purpose?” This subtle but significant shift reflects the broader cultural accommodation that has infected modern Christianity.

    The Accommodation to Cultural Pressures

    Modern Christianity has fallen prey to the spirit of the age in ways that would have horrified previous generations of believers. The pressure to be “relevant” has led to compromises that fundamentally alter the gospel message. Seeker-sensitive churches design their services around the comfort of unbelievers rather than the worship of God, forgetting that “God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth” (John 4:24).

    The influence of secular psychology has replaced biblical anthropology. Where Scripture teaches that the heart is “deceitful above all things, and desperately sick” (Jeremiah 17:9), modern preaching suggests that people are fundamentally good but damaged by external circumstances. Christian counseling often mirrors secular therapy more than biblical discipleship.

    LGBTQ+ affirmation in many denominations represents perhaps the clearest example of cultural accommodation trumping biblical authority. Despite clear biblical teaching on sexuality and marriage (Genesis 2:24, Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11), many churches have redefined sin as “alternative lifestyle” to avoid cultural offense.

    The social justice movement within evangelicalism has similarly shifted focus from individual sin and salvation to systemic oppression and social transformation. While Christians should certainly care about justice (Micah 6:8), the gospel’s primary concern is not reforming society but regenerating sinners.

    Images representing the contrast between historical church discipline and modern seeker-sensitive approaches

Visual representations of social media influence on modern Christianity versus the solitary study of historical preachers

    The Loss of Prophetic Authority

    Nineteenth-century preachers spoke with the authority of prophets – men who had encountered the living God and were compelled to declare His Word regardless of consequences. They understood their role as watchmen on the walls, warning of coming judgment and pointing sinners to the only refuge in Christ.

    Modern preachers, by contrast, often function more as motivational speakers or life coaches than prophetic voices. Mega-church pastors like Andy Stanley have publicly questioned the reliability of Scripture, while others focus on practical life advice rather than eternal truths. The fear of man has replaced the fear of God, leading to messages that tickle ears rather than pierce hearts.

    Church growth strategies have replaced Spirit-led ministry. Pastors study demographics and market research rather than spending hours in prayer and biblical study. The result is preaching designed to attract crowds rather than convert souls, forgetting that “faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17).

    Contemporary Examples of Diluted Preaching

    Hillsong’s emphasis on emotional experience over doctrinal truth exemplifies modern Christianity’s shift toward feelings-based faith. Their songs, while musically appealing, often lack theological depth and biblical precision.

    The Emergent Church Movement has questioned fundamental doctrines like penal substitutionary atonement, hell, and biblical inerrancy in the name of “postmodern authenticity.” Leaders like Brian McLaren have suggested that traditional evangelical theology is outdated and culturally insensitive.

    Word of Faith preachers like Kenneth Copeland and Joyce Meyer have transformed the gospel into a formula for material prosperity, directly contradicting Jesus’ warning that “a person’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions” (Luke 12:15).

    Even within Reformed circles, there has been accommodation. Some have softened the doctrine of hell, questioned the exclusivity of Christ, or emphasized social action over evangelism, forgetting that “there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

    The Remedy: A Return to Biblical Preaching

    The solution is not to romanticize the past but to recover biblical principles that transcend cultural boundaries. True preaching must be:

    Expository – Working systematically through Scripture rather than cherry-picking verses to support predetermined themes or systematically going through a passage to bring out all spiritual truths and applications as Paul commanded Timothy to “preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching” (2 Timothy 4:2). Ultimately the text must determine the message, not contemporary relevance.

    Confrontational – Willing to address sin directly and call for genuine repentance. The gospel is inherently offensive to the natural man and cannot be made palatable without destroying its power. Jesus Himself said, “If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you” (John 15:18).

    Christ-centered – Every sermon must point to Jesus Christ as the only hope for sinners. Moralistic preaching that focuses on human effort rather than divine grace is not gospel preaching at all. As Paul declared, “I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2). To the oft given complaint that such focus would bore a congregation – the carefully study and bringing out of the Word of God ensures that this is ever ‘new’ and ‘fresh’. Have we gone through the entirety of the Bible, and savouring Christ as He is presented in all of Scriptures.

    Doctrinally sound – Grounded in the great truths of Reformed theology: the sovereignty of God, the depravity of man, salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. Paul warned Timothy that “the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions” (2 Timothy 4:3).

    Biblical Examples of Uncompromising Preaching

    John the Baptist exemplified prophetic preaching when he called the Pharisees and Sadducees a “brood of vipers” and warned them to “bear fruit in keeping with repentance” (Matthew 3:7-8). He did not soften his message to avoid offense.

    Stephen’s sermon in Acts 7 culminated in calling his hearers “stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears” who “always resist the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7:51). His uncompromising proclamation cost him his life but advanced the gospel.

    Paul’s preaching in Athens (Acts 17:22-31) demonstrates how to engage culture without compromising truth. He used their own poets and philosophers as entry points but concluded with the non-negotiable demand for repentance in light of coming judgment.

    Jesus Himself spoke more about hell than heaven, warned that “the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few” (Matthew 7:14), and declared that “unless you repent, you will all likewise perish” (Luke 13:3).

    The Eternal Stakes

    The disparity between 19th-century and 21st-century preaching is not merely a matter of stylistic preference – eternal souls hang in the balance. When the gospel is diluted, people are deceived into thinking they are saved when they remain in their sins. When sin is minimized, there is no urgency for repentance. When God’s wrath is ignored, there is no appreciation for His mercy.

    Scripture warns that “many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness’” (Matthew 7:22-23). How many sitting in churches today have been given false assurance through diluted preaching?

    The church desperately needs preachers who will stand in the gap like the prophets of old – men who fear God more than man, who love souls more than popularity, and who would rather preach to empty pews than fill them with false converts. Only such preaching can cut through the fog of contemporary confusion and point sinners to the narrow way that leads to life.

    The question facing every preacher today is simple: Will you accommodate the spirit of the age, or will you proclaim the eternal Word of God with the same uncompromising faithfulness that characterized your predecessors? The souls of your hearers depend on your answer, for “how then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching?” (Romans 10:14).

    The remedy is clear: return to the old paths where the good way is (Jeremiah 6:16), preach the Word in season and out of season (2 Timothy 4:2), and remember that God’s Word will not return empty but will accomplish His purpose (Isaiah 55:11). Only then can the church recover its prophetic voice and fulfill its calling to be salt and light in a decaying and darkened world.

  • Re-aligning the Mind and Heart

    We live in a world that has a “broken” default state. This is the Christian point of view, if one were to align our view with the Bible. There are (of course) many Christian believers who may not believe in this – but if one is to source their belief from the authority of Scriptures, this is a conclusion that cannot be denied. The practical evidence of “broken” world is the inability to achieve bliss, peace and happiness that is continuous. Even the most ignorant (positive-compelling, negative-denying) person would admit that it is impossible to remain in a happy state or to expect things to go our way for periods of time; we certainly can have snippets of happiness and enjoyment, but these cannot last for long because the world is in a state where the little good that exist will quickly be overwhelmed by uncertainties, human sin, selfishness and calamities that often are beyond our control. If one would hedge on something certain for their business, it would be a safe bet on human suffering, a good example of such would be the news media business – can you imagine if everything was peaceful and going perfectly without any problems? There would be nothing to publish.

    “For to set the mind on the flesh is death, but to set the mind on the Spirit is life and peace.” Romans 8:6

    This verse provides a timely reminder (to me) that it is always a necessity to re-align both our mind and heart to God’s vision. Man-made visions will always be plagued with the simple problem being narrow-minded and short-sighted. It is boastful to think that we have the capacity to see beyond our given limits (we have limits). Thus, it makes sense to subscribe to God’s view and vision – because His thoughts are not ours, His views expand vastly to the infinite canvas that we cannot hope to even comprehend. And it is true, our thoughts fold within us when we see things from our own human logic, and data that is confined to our senses and experience! How pitiful that we allow ourselves to be dictated by the ‘flesh’ in that manner. We end up majoring on the minors and minoring on the majors. The opposite can be true as well – our thoughts inflate our feelings to assume that things will be great… only to be confronted with the unknowns of time.

    Paul, the writer of the verse, was not delusional: he knew that God will not explain or detail out the future for him. He is not told the manner of his death. He was not told the path that will end his ministry and his life. And yet, he is assured that to set the mind on the flesh is death – not physical death, but spiritual death! The death of a thousand death – for we cannot allow ourselves to be united with the world/flesh – to do so is to disown the “spiritual adoption” that belongs to Christian believers. The life of the Christian is not liberty for sinful, selfish decisions and living, but liberty to submit to the Greater King who loves and saves. There is just no “grey” area in this. The Roman soldiers who have cast their lot with Christ, remain soldiers who are faithful to Rome, but ultimately greater obedience rendered to the Invisible, Omnipotent Ruler who dwells in the heavenly places. These soldiers are dutiful to their earthly king, but more so to their eternal King above – they gladly defy the evil commands of their earthly masters and suffer under the lashes meted against them. They are ostracized but not alone in the universal family of adopted sons and daughters of God.

    When man (flesh) has nothing to threaten, the Christian is invincible. The picture that often comes to mind is the scene from the famous Christopher Nolan film “The Dark Knight” when Batman brutally beats up the Joker in order to get information of the whereabouts of his childhood friend: the Joker rightly laughs/cries out to Batman – “you have no power, nothing to threaten me!” What can the flesh, the world, threaten the Christian believer? With our families? With our jobs? With our health? Nothing actually lasts. Nothing can last.

    This is something that hits me harder as each year pass by and time flies. Be prepared for things to pass. It will happen. But look for the eternal things instead. It is like the childhood that we will never get back – it is gone. We have the memories and the lessons and that’s it. We cannot wish for it (it does not change anything). Instead, enjoy the present, and the future before those begin to pass as well. Prepare for what the Spirit has in store for Christian believers – these will guard both our heart and mind. This is eternal hope that cannot be destroyed. I needed this re-alignment. It is just so easy to be caught up by the emotions, the events, the incidences, the troubles, the problems, the pain, the uncertainty – but fix our mind (notice, it is with our thoughts FIRST), and then the “life” and “peace” will be in us.

  • The Chief Parable of Christ – A Parable of Reality and Hope

    The parable of the sower or soils is the first parable that is recorded for us in the Gospels – this is consistently recorded for us in Matthew, Mark and Luke’s gospel. What makes it the “chief” or most important of them all is not just the chronological introduction of it but the fact that it is the first parable to be interpreted by the Lord Himself to the listeners. This parable is also important because of the context of its introduction – it is in the midst of Jesus’ ministry that seems to be at the apex (in terms of the crowd that followed Him). We see this in the following passages:

    That same day Jesus went out of the house and sat beside the sea. And great crowds gathered about him, so that he got into a boat and sat down. And the whole crowd stood on the beach.
    (Matthew 13:1-2)

    Again he began to teach beside the sea. And a very large crowd gathered about him, so that he got into a boat and sat in it on the sea, and the whole crowd was beside the sea on the land.
    (Mark 4:1)

    And when a great crowd was gathering and people from town after town came to him, he said in a parable,
    (Luke 8:4)

    From Matthew, Mark and Luke’s Gospel Account

    One inference we can make based on this observation of the crowd and the parable’s prominence in the three gospels is this: the lesson(s) of this parable is absolutely important for the general populace – not just the close disciples of Christ (commonly known as the Twelve). This is one passage that can be used for both believers and non-believers alike. However, we must balance our application by paying attention to the fact that the interpretation of this parable was mainly given only to the close disciples of Christ in a private setting – not a public setting. Why the seeming discrepancy? Why is the parable preached publicly but the interpretation privately given?

    The Lord explicitly refers to Isaiah 6:9 in Matthew 13:13-15, Mark 4:11-12 and Luke 8:9-10 – this is not coincidence nor is this merely about the “purpose of all parables” as many bible translators and commentators would put forth. The Holy Spirit inspired this explanation to precede the interpretation of “this” parable – thus, the explanation tells us that believers would gain more, spiritually speaking, from the lessons given in this parable.

    We are not going to give a lengthy exposition of this parable – this is not the purpose of this post. There are many good sermons and commentaries that give detailed explanations along with applications on the parable. Rather, I would like to focus on an application that is not commonly drawn from this parable – for believers.

    The three soils, hard, stony and weedy are realities the type of hearts found among sinful men in this world – in all generations. There is no time where we find the world filled with soft, good soil that is brimming with spiritual fruitfulness. For the believer, this is a caution – that we who believe in Christ (the Gospel symbolised as seed sown on the ground) are in the minority. The caution is for us not to take this truth for granted – many are called, but few are chosen. God’s gracious dealings with believers is not a small thing – in the Grand Scheme of things, we are truly blessed – infinitely blessed compared to many who either are hard-hearted, half-hearted (stony ground) and worldly-hearted (corrupted by the worldly influences and circumstances). A first-time planter would be extremely happy that a quarter of his efforts actually bear fruit and did not perish! This should be our outlook – what wonder and joy in God saving a quarter out of eternal damnation, when the whole lot deserves to die and remain fruitless. God is able to save all – but there is the reality of sin and the needful condemnation and damnation of sinners. For God to just wipe off the effects of sins in one brief moment at the start of Man’s Fall in Adam is to ‘cheapen’ God’s justice. A king who forgives the wrongs of his own son who does vile things will be looked down – here is a king who knows no justice, trivialising wrongs. God is under NO obligation to us to clear any of our sins – the fact that He does forgive the few (in every generation) is already a great condescension and a show of His remarkable mercy on an undeserving people. To save for eternity, not just temporary, is a grace that has no words that can ever be described by our frail and finite minds.

    Secondly, the description of the fruit that is borne by the seed that fell on good soil is usually downplayed by preachers. I have been guilty of doing so many times before. But let us give it the right place in the hearts and minds of believers. The passage describes it this way:

    But those that were sown on the good soil are the ones who hear the word and accept it and bear fruit, thirtyfold and sixtyfold and a hundredfold.”

    Mark 4:20 (ESV)

    The hope for believers is that their lives will see a supernatural increase in spiritual fruitfulness. The most “unbelievable” part of this parable would probably lie here. Many cannot believe that this can ever be true – their lives may have changed, but in accordance to this measure? Two fold increase is already a very unbelievable increase in agricultural terms. Two fold is equal to 200%. For it to be thirtyfold – we are looking at 3000% at a very minimum! Impossible is the word that keeps popping in my mind. For believers who have lived longer in this world – there are deeper challenges and troughs in their journey to the Celestial City. Sometimes, we are tempted to look at the promised increase and become depressed – because the reality is far from the expectation given. Is the Lord exaggerating? No. He is challenging us to see things in accordance to His eyes – to perceive and understand things through His mind, not ours. Thus, the disciples found themselves echoing our sentiments in other times as well – one such instance was in Matthew 19:25-26 – “When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?” But Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”” This is faith. Believing that God is the God of impossibilities. That the very thing that we constantly despair about – our lack of humility, our secret sins, our constant weaknesses, our “life long behaviours” – can be changed. The change is not superficial or cosmetic – but lifelong – eternal! When we measure it in accordance to the effect and lasting impact it has on our soul – we can see that it far exceeds 200% or 3000%… this is an infinite percentile that does not lessen. This is a dimension that we need to refocus our spiritual, inner eyes on.

    Can the Lord change our sinful nature – sanctify us in a real way – for eternity? Yes. Will the scope of the change be for every part of our lives on earth? No. For we still live in this fallen world. But the longer we live in this world, the more the Holy Spirit regenerates our being – preparing us for eternal glory at His coming or at our entering into that glory of His. This is the hope that the parable of the sower gives to us – especially those who are honest, real and seeking Jesus with all of our beings – weak, frail that may be. Amen.

  • The Right to Question Christian Teachings and Practices

    Questions, questions and more questions…

    One of the joys of having regular bible studies as a family is the non-stop questions from my children. One topic or issue can easily bring up loads of questions that are sometimes relevant to the passage we were reading, or spin off into deep theological territory. This is pure joy – a wealth of opportunities for Christians to sharpen their own understanding of God and also to help articulate things that may have been taken for granted all this time.

    We (the Christian community) are sorely lacking the skills and the mindset to engage the world around us. Instead, many are taking the approach that so outlines the whole political interaction in America at the moment: it is them or us. It is all aggression and claiming “fake news” when the other side purports information or statements that do conform to our views. It is pathetic on both sides; more on the side of professing believers because we claim to have received Grace from God.

    At this point, there will always be the militant-minded Christians who questions the need to be all things to all men for the sake of the Gospel – Moses and the prophets were fiery and brought “hell” to the hearers! That is their claim. But that conveniently ignores the radical circumstance found in most of Old Testament history – God was working through a theocracy (God-leading and ruling a physical nation). The apostles would plead and instruct Christians to be gentle in our Christian engagements with the world. The Lord Himself told the parable of the cunning manager and wished that believers would learn to make use of our resources (all of them) to turn sinners into the kingdom of God.

    It begins with this main point: do we allow the listener, the believer, the unbeliever, the pagan to question our beliefs? Put another way, is any question so great and powerful that it can destroy your faith? If there is – throw away your faith – for it is a WEAK and obviously, MAN-MADE faith that cannot stand the mildest push! What a relief it was to read in Matthew’s Gospel, John the Baptist’s doubt over Jesus’ identity and purpose and how the Lord responded to his question. There was no scolding or personal attack – just an assurance through explanation, followed by the commendation of John who was languishing in prison under wicked Herod.

    Are you open to being questioned over a practice that you hold to? Over why the Bible is accepted “blindly” by Christians? Over why the God of the Bible IS the true and only God? If you cannot even explain why your church insists on people wearing “their best” on Sundays, or why the sermon was so confusing and boring – you really need to re-think what type of religion you have? Maybe religion in general has reached a saturation point and is now manifesting the only response it can to a time of over-population and over-connectivity: a Trumpian-religion that is full of hypocrisy, aggression and divisiveness.

    Let us welcome and invite those who are curious, weak, doubting, new and opposing to ask away – as the apostle puts it at the end of his letter: “Walk in wisdom toward outsiders, making the best use of the time. Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.” (Colossians 4:5-6)

  • American Gospel: Christ Alone (?)

    Controversial Movie Released a few years back

    This is an intriguing movie. Message is certainly not something that is foreign to me, but the tone of the movie is worth exploring. Is this something effective to be used in evangelism and in seeking to share the biblical Gospel in a post-modern world of hyper-connectivity? Will consider this at length in a future post. But have a watch. Carefully.

  • A Perspective of Cultish Upbringing (Christian Cult)

    An IT (Computer) Youtuber Gets Real Over His Upbringing

    One of the most unpopular topics (taboo) in this part of the world (South East Asia) is talking about the way we were brought up. Very few have a pleasant and good upbringing – it is hard to be honest about something so personal. I had an excellent childhood and upbringing – not perfect, for there is really no perfect family – but there were so many positives compared to the negatives.

    The Youtuber in the video embedded has had a drama filled life – and as he was dealing with his fracturing dysfunctional family, he realised that it had a lot to do with his upbringing – he was brought up in a cult. A Christian cult. One that was apparently many times worse than the “Jesus Camp” that was exposed a couple of years back in a tell-all documentary. His description of the ‘cult’ is frighteningly very accurate of modern-day Pentecostalism and the Charismatic movement. Over the years since the “Toronto Blessing” event, many charismatic churches has doubled down on the extremism of that “movement” – however, many of the dangerous and doubtful practices still remain today – along with the psychological purposes of the activities and actions that are non-biblical.

    Incidentally, the recent music remixes of Kenneth Copeland’s failed proclamations against COVID-19 may seem funny at first, until you realise – he was one of the early Toronto Blessing supporter and founder. Yup, all that has come out of that sad event, even in Malaysia, still exists among the Modern Pentecostal churches – even though some churches has recovered some better Biblical ground.

    Do have a listen to the “honest”, “mature” and “uncomfortable” recounting by Joshua. If you have questions about Christianity, the Bible and church practices, you have the right to ask until you are satisfied with the answer given and you have the right to remain unconvinced. No church or Christian believer can hold your conscience ransom. Sadly, few in today’s Christendom allow for such honest questioning – for fear of eroding their own “faith” or “practices” – or as some have rightly put it – eroding their ego.

  • Traumatic Listening Experience

    It is often something that is not talked about publicly, but something that is frequently talked, whispered in private – that there is something disturbing in certain types of preaching. Coming from a conservative, evangelical, Reformed Christian persuasion there are things that are plainly obvious but are considered taboo to be talked about (at least openly). Simply: some preachings are dangerous to the listeners. Having time to step back from the activity of preaching, it is more plain to me now that certain types of preaching should be avoided at all cost and not indulged in – particularly if it is a weekly dose of.

    In my previous posts, I have touched on the content of preaching – how poor content can truly spiritually weaken a believer and listener by allowing the person to stagnate and worse, to be worldly. The preoccupation of worldliness is but an inward reflection of the heart’s spiritual condition. This is discernible only by the Spirit using the instrumentality of the Word (which the Spirit inspired). Sadly, in conservative circles – particularly in Asian churches that are more strict in ‘conformity’ and ‘authority’ – this sort of action is performed quite often by the preacher.

    Thus, you do get (I kid you not) preachers who would dare to point the finger to the sin of someone in the congregation without actually pointing them out! Of course, this is partly a type of ‘defense’ that the preacher can disclaim if they are called out on abusing the pulpit – but the actual effect of being under such ‘thundering’ preaching is traumatic for the listener especially when it is done weekly. Warnings are often given in the Scriptures, especially in the Old Testament, but such pointing of finger to a particular group of people who does this and that is just a tactic to ‘speak out’ against a person(s) without having to take the person aside to explain and rebuke the person(s)’s alleged wrong doing. Doubly sad is the prevalent notion that such preachers are likened to the Old Testament “man of God” – thus giving them the ‘unbiblical’ warrant of doing what no New Testament preacher ever did in Scriptures. This sort of preaching matches the attitude of the Pharisees, who were very quick to accuse and question the actions and motives of the Lord Jesus (as reflected in the Gospels). As a slight digression – the term “man of God” is often abused and misused in conservative circles, but it is made plain in Scriptures – see 2 Timothy 3:17, where the man of God obviously refers to the Christian believer (in the context of the chapter) and not to Timothy the preacher.

    The second type of preaching is those that maintain an aggressive style. Not only in raising the voice, but in actually shouting at the audience. I get that many would call this “passionate” preaching, but this is an emotive style – often to provoke the listeners to “dare” challenge what they are saying! Why? Because they believe that they have taken on themselves the “righteous anger of God”. That is what the audience believe – those who can tolerate such aggressive style week by week. In order to not be affected, the listeners must be part of the preacher’s gang – so that their conscience are not affected. “This is not about me – it is about that person or this person”. This is exactly how cultish behaviours are grown. In some of the famous preachers who employ such styles, you can almost always here some in the congregation giving their affirmations “yes, sir”, “amen” – because they see themselves as part of the support group for such preachers. Let the preacher “get ‘im” – he is “our” preacher. Notice that the Lord Jesus did not preach that way. The apostle Paul was ridiculed for his simple, quiet mannerism – in contrast to the more eloquent and if you want to speculate, flamboyant, preaching style of the other ‘super preachers’.

    Finally, you have the repetitive preacher who uses their aggressive preaching style to hide behind poor sermon preparation. I admit, there are many preachers who are not gifted in oration. Some who are not, try to compensate by picking up a technique or a trade trick. This may come to the dressing or the equipment that they use on stage. But these problems pale in comparison to the ‘lazy’ preacher who leans on their experience to preach. They serve up spiritual food that is lacking in balance, substance and “freshness”. The latter word is the relevance or application of God’s Word to the listener. If we believe that God is real and His Spirit indwells believers, His Word when properly explained is clear in how it is to be practised and used in daily living. Unfortunately, the lazy preacher begins to use the messages as a sounding board for his opinions or his ‘mission’ or ‘vision’ – not God, but his own. Carefully meditation and understanding of God’s Word will help one discern between a preacher’s words and God’s Word. God’s Word is full of diversity and unity – united in the common theme, but diverse in all aspects of life – because life IS complicated. The preacher that rehashes the same things over and over again apart from the emphasis of Scriptures is self-serving. Plainly, this is brainwashing. And it happens a lot because many like to put themselves into a man-made system, because they stand to ‘circumvent’ this system to make it their own, and they like the affirmation given by others.

    I am so soothed by the plain preaching of Scriptures nowadays. Those who prioritise God’s Word first over man’s. God’s Spirit does wonders when His Word is made plain. Preaching that is true comforts believers, affirms their position in Christ while challenging them to be set apart for Christ. Such preaching is foolish in the eyes of the unbelieving but precious and useful in God’s Almighty hand. Trauma-inducing preaching may cause momentary fear and action, but that momentum can never be sustained – because it is only sustained by fear. And to a conscience-battered, brainwashed person – everything is fearful! No more of these traumatic preaching experiences – go get some eternally memorable experiences that bring the heart to glorify God because of His great love!

  • Psalm 1:1-3

    Tree planted by the rivers of water – an apt Spiritual picture of true human need

    The psalmist proclaims the blessedness of walking upright before the LORD in the opening verses of the poetic magnum opus of the Bible. If we were to read it with a liberal mindset that is saturated with modern inclinations and belief, we would find the first verse offensive: how can the psalmist have an elevated view on such a “holy person”? There is great offence to claim that a spiritually sensitive, godward looking person is more “blessed” than a pagan person. The world we live in has unfortunately become a morally selfish and dark world – one that elevates self to godhood (even though the words may not explicitly state that). The modern man finds it dumb to acknowledge that order in this universe points to a singular Higher Being, also known as, the Creator of all things. Instead, they insist that the modern man is self-made out of randomness – they violently wipe away any possibility that randomness is merely a cope out excuse to allow for anarchy and a covering of all things under moral ambiguity.

    If we, the reader, can accept the premise that there is a God, and that God is the source of all things whether material or immaterial – then the only conclusion is “happy” or “blessed” is the person who is on the side of that Creator! To acknowledge our Creator is like a child who acknowledges his or her parent as a parent: it is just natural and right. The child who refuses to acknowledge the presence, part and position of the parent is universally identified as an errant child. How is it that anyone would fault the same logic between the creature and his or her Creator?

    The second verse posits the source for “knowing” this God or Creator. The creature is woefully unequipped to know the Maker, for it is like the finite trying to experience the infinite. In this universe, God condescends Himself – put Himself down – to our level in order to communicate His thoughts to us. Without this condescension on His part, no creature can ever know his or her Creator. Thus, the blessed man who acknowledges God finds true delight in knowing His will and thoughts. This is unlike the many who claims belief in God but finds no delight in knowing God; hypocrites who desire mere identification with the Creator, but with no real love or desire for more. This is not a harsh pronouncement, the logic is sound. Does not one rightly worries for the child that refuses any communication with the parents upon birth! What is the natural reaction for one, is also the basis for the other.

    For the sinner who confesses his or her inadequacies and looks heavenward for answers, it is normal to find rapturous delight in understanding the mind of the Creator. Not only delight but purpose, strength, conviction and direction – all important components that grow the person in his or her journey in life. The psalmist provides the most apt picture that transcends all generation – the natural picture of a tree’s dependency to its water source. A tree needs water and finds permanent sustenance from the river. The roots gravitate naturally towards the direction of the river and in time shows the proof of dependence by the bearing of fruit. Despite harsh circumstances that are unpredictable, the tree survives; whether it is famine, drought or the wars of men – the tree can survive when its root and place is by the rivers of water. Similarly, the person that abides by the purpose, direction, conviction and truths of the Creator of all, will bear the fruit of his or her existence – despite whatever opposition or unfavourable circumstances. This is what the psalmist is inspired to proclaim. Ironically, this is what the modern person needs, in a world full of noise and confusion – we need to come back to the reason for our being and to find delight in “getting it”.

  • On Whose Authority?

    This is Not an Uncommon Scene

    And when he entered the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came up to him as he was teaching, and said, “By what authority are you doing these things, and who gave you this authority?

    Matthew 21:23 (NASB)

    The question posed by the Jewish leaders actually captures their religious mentality and mannerism at that time – spirituality is all about citing or referring to a particular rabbi or teacher: the more prominent the teacher, the “better” the teaching would be. In giving his own testimony of the conversion wrought in his heart, the apostle Paul would give evidence to the religious leaders of his own “religious grooming” and steady progression within the Pharaisical ranks by citing his honoured mentor, Gamaliel in Acts 22:3. Here was a culture not unlike our own, where prominence and power are weighed by the people “we know”.

    Thus, it was not surprising that the Jews, in general, were amazed that an “unknown” man (Jesus of Nazareth) was deemed a prophet, who had no “great person” authenticating and giving Him His credentials to preach and teach. This was an abnormality among the Jewish community. Jesus’ answer in Matthew 21:24-25 revealed the truth concerning ALL prophets of God – their authority came from God Himself, visible by God’s authenticating power working among them (visibly seen in prophets like Moses and Elijah). In Jesus Christ’s case, He is God, as He clearly explained in the Gospel of John, especially in John 8:48-59. This was evidenced by the manner of His speaking (with authority, Matthew 7:29) and by the effect it had on the people (through His miracles).

    The great tragedy that we see is the return of Modern-Day Christianity to the practices of the Jewish people 2,000 years ago. Preachers are more concerned with the “quotations” that they use and by the “camp” that they belong to, rather than pointing to the Self-authenticating and Innate Authority of the Word of God. In this, the modern church apes the academic world – citing the interpretation of this person and that, rather than trusting in the plain language of Scripture. Certainly, there are some things that are difficult to understand and some that will not be fully known until the Lord’s Return – nevertheless, what we have is clearly explained and constantly repeated throughout Scriptures. We should major on the things that God deems as important – this is by the repetition and clarity given. Likewise, we should minor (not specialise) in the things that are obscure and unique.

    The pursuit of “authority” beyond those of Scriptures give rise to the constant idol that is warned by the apostle Paul – that of the “institution of church” itself. The “man of perdition” is the man that usurps God’s place as the head of the Church –

    Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.

    2 Thessalonians 2:3-4

    Historically, many have pointed the finger to the Roman Pope, but could the “man of lawlessness” be much closer? That document that is proclaimed by many (whether they be creeds or confessions or statements of faiths) as necessary has become the tool to subjugate and control the mind of well-meaning Christians into conformity with “people” rather than of God! We need to wake up from this “tradition” and come back to THE authority of Scripture. The heart is easily swayed by man’s own whimsical fancies without realising it.

    We need to check ourselves. Are we believing something because of the list of “celebrity preachers” who endorses such views? Are we attracted to a message because of that quote that ‘perfectly” captures the interpretation? Or are we hooked unto the words because they are God’s? This is what we need to recover. 500 years of Reformation and it seems to me, we are starting back at where we supposedly left. It is time for us to check our beliefs – on whose authority do we believe.

  • The Failure of Practical Expository Preaching

    History is one of those subjects that are vital in developing our thought processes and our character but is commonly hated by many. There is a prevalent notion among the newer generations that the only history that we should be bothered with is the history that we make. Such responses aptly summarise the key problem with these generations: preoccupation with self.

    In the modern evangelical movement (church scene), we find similar shifts happening especially with the ‘expository preaching’ development of the last few decades. Though this may not be reflected within the academic or theoretical arena, it certainly is seen in the practice. To set the context – “expository preaching” has (surprisingly) varied definitions based on one’s theological and church background. I find Raymond’s article on “The Gospel Coalition” helpful as he does the difficult task of compiling a few sources for the definition: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/erik-raymond/what-is-expository-preaching/

    John MacArthur: The message finds its sole source in Scripture. The message is extracted from Scripture through careful exegesis. The message preparation correctly interprets Scripture in its normal sense and its context. The message clearly explains the original God-intended meaning of Scripture. The message applies the Scriptural meaning for today.

    Bryan Chappell: The main idea of an expository sermon the topic, the divisions of that idea, main points, and the development of those divisions, all come from truths the text itself contains. No significant portions of the text is ignored. In other words, expositors willingly stay within the boundaries of the text and do not leave until they have surveyed its entirety with its hearers.

    John Stott: Exposition refers to the content of the sermon (biblical truth) rather than its style (a running commentary). To expound Scripture is to bring out of the text what is there and expose it to view. The expositor opens what appears to be closed, makes plain what is obscure, unravels what is knotted, and unfolds what is tightly packed.

    Although there are nuances in the preachers’ definitions, we can see the areas of agreement. My definition would be like this: “expository preaching” is the art (skill) of examining, elaborating and clarifying the Word of God, whether it is a single verse, or a passage or large portions of Scripture, to an intended audience. If there is any ingenuity in my definition (it is not my intention) it would be the final four words – “to an intended audience” which I will explain in due time.

    It is common to hear from the pulpits of many churches, or even in the explanations given in some weekly bulletins, that the church believes in “expository preaching”. However, when one sits in the pews, one quickly realises the opposite. The biggest problem is the lack of examining the Bible passage – usually, only the scantiest overview is given and the listener is to “put their faith” in that scanty overview of what the passage is about. Or, there is the over-elaboration of the wider passage (context) without dealing with the immediate passage under consideration. Even when the passage is dealt with, many verses are ignored or the most general meaning is presented to the listener. Sadly, the most dangerous form is the expositing of the preacher’s theology, mood, and direction rather than God’s. This is the most dangerous because it hides behind the illusion that the Word of God is actually being taught. From my past experiences, this has given rise to unhealthy beliefs, practices and even abuses that begin from an unbiblical indoctrination that claims otherwise. The effect is quite pronounced on the listeners – they begin to “want to please the preacher” or to “listen more to the preacher”, but not to the Word of God for themselves. The Berean spirit is usually not found in many cases. One can easily whip out the Macbook and type out every word that proceeds from the mouth of the preacher, and miss the true meaning that the Lord Jesus gave in Matthew 4:4 – “It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”

    Why is it so hard to find good, simple preachers who will just spend time examining the Word of God? From my own experiences and understanding of the ministers’ struggles and process – it boils down to a few factors (which cannot fit this brief article). The chief of those would be 1) insufficient time spent in the study room, 2) over-reliance on own experiences, 3) mechanical or routine treatment in studying God’s Word, 4) aiming for “the message” rather than doing the passage justice.

    The first reason is commonly found in those “over-worked” ministers, who have a hundred and one things to do every week. This is not a critique but a simple explanation of what is. Especially among certain Asian ministers, there is the unspoken belief that the minister must justify their salaries to the congregation. This results in the minister taking up all “tasks” that come in their way, whether it is from the new visitor to neighbours, elderly, children, and countless others who have been, is part of or who will join the local church. Unfortunately, this is more often found in small churches (small in size). Is this biblical? Yes and no. The apostles made it clear in Acts 6:2-4 – And the twelve summoned the full number of the disciples and said, “It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God to serve tables. Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will appoint to this duty. But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word.” Certainly, the Christian believer should show love to their neighbours, especially ministers who ought to show hospitality – but their main job is “devotion” to PRAYER and the WORD. The minister who is not wrestling on their knees in prayer for their congregation will find it rare to find the congregation wrestling with the Word of God in their conscience.

    The second reason for this misdirection in exposition-emphasis is the over-reliance of the minister to their ‘knowledge of the Scriptures’. Every minister who is serious about their gifts and calling will grow their understanding of the whole counsel of God, there is no doubt about it. However, it is perplexing when ministers begin to unconsciously elevate biblical theology and systematic theology above the very Scriptures themselves. The common conservative defense is to claim that the particular systematic theology is derived from Scripture and remain adamant with their particular emphasis. This stumbles the preacher as they have already concluded before they even have begun, by stating that “this” is the goal or the message – the passage is merely a vehicle to help them enforce their “made-up view”. The end result is the preacher bringing his interpretation and views into the passage or verse, thus solidifying the preacher’s own bias or personal preferences over and against the passage’s actual meaning. Sometimes, this over-reliance is also the result of lack of time or exhaustion on the part of the preacher – the minister quickly relies on experience to expedite the ‘preparation of the sermon’.

    The third reason for the poor practice of expository preaching comes down to a “dulled spiritual sense’. This happens when we have gotten into a routine and allow ourselves to take things for granted. For example, the minister is called to handle the Beatitudes in Matthew 5, or another passage that he has done before: it is easy for the minister to assume that the points or message of the passage is the same as before. Thus, the minister does little to re-work on the passage, assuming that they have “done” the passage before. This is done more often or not – just try to listen to preachers who preach their “old” sermons – there is no difference. Sure, the wording(s) may change here and there, but the general points remain the same. Should we expect a thoroughly different message? No, but the grace that works in the heart and mind of the minister will help bring new things out of old things. An aging saint that grows older sees things with greater depth and with better skills than the younger self. Unfortunately, many allow their spiritual sense to be dulled by repetition and a “cold” walk with the Lord – often made worse by a lack of true and constant prayer with Him.

    Lastly, this often happens when ministers are faced with certain heart convictions – they attach whatever passage they are dealing with their “favourite topic”. There is the example given by the late teacher/preacher S Lewis Johnson of a Baptist minister who would always link the message to the importance of water baptism. This may seem funny until you realise how horrifying it is to give “permission” to listeners to do the same! Yet this is the sad reality of many who claim to be expository preachers. One preacher may claim not to believe in “works over faith”, but if every sermon is going to guilt, rebuke and call on “righteous works” do not be surprised if the congregants exhibit a tendency to legalism and salvation based on works. Likewise to the preacher who emphasises “evangelism” – every message preached becomes a call to action that is done out of a sense of duty devoid of passion and true conviction.

    True expository preaching minimises such dangerous man-initiated errors. To conclude, the onus is on the listener to make sure we “listen” to God’s Word rather than man’s word. It is not enough to claim this or that person is a “man of God” and turn off our thinking and discerning faculty. The rule of our life and conscience ought to be God’s Word that is Spirit-inspired. That is why God’s Word must be properly examined, elaborated and clarified by preachers. This is not an easy task – for it demands the preacher to do these three activities for himself FIRST before he communicates the Word to the congregation. After the application of his study is done to himself (as Paul hints in Acts 20:28), the minister can then prepare to communicate the lessons to the listener. What good is ANY expository preaching that fails to be communicated to the intended audience? Thus expository preaching must incorporate the intended audience as part of its definition. Can expository preaching be done for young children? Certainly. Can expository preaching be practiced to elderly persons? Absolutely. To make it effective, one must take into consideration the listeners – are we preparing, wording, articulating, structuring and ordering the whole message so that the Word of God is properly understood by the listeners? If we look at the time of Nehemiah, it seems that the teachers did exactly that – They read from the book, from the Law of God, clearly, and they gave the sense, so that the people understood the reading (Nehemiah 8:8). How wonderful for the teachers and ministers were to give the sense of God’s Word clearly to the people (made up of different demographics)? This IS possible, but with hard work from the minister. It IS possible because God’s Spirit supplies what is lacking in the minister, and the listeners.

    There are more things to say on this topic – but for now, this will suffice. Food for thought, especially for those who truly yearn for “pure spiritual milk” (1 Peter 2:2).

    Spurgeon’s Sermon Notes